MarketScreener Outlines Australian Trading Technology Connectivity Push
MarketScreener's 'Preparing for a more connected market' outlook signals interoperability, clearing and data choices for Australian buy-side and sell-side desks.

Execution notes
- MarketScreener published an outlook titled 'Preparing for a more connected market' covering Australian trading technology
- Australian equities connectivity runs through the Sydney-based Australian Liquidity Centre (ALC) co-location facility
- Australia delivers consolidated tape through a single primary exchange feed, unlike the US SIP model
- OMS/EMS, connectivity, market data and post-trade form the four typical stack segments in such an outlook
- The source extract contains no quoted executive, volume statistic or specific rule reference
MarketScreener published an Australian trading-technology outlook titled "Preparing for a more connected market," framing the next phase of execution, connectivity and data integration for buy-side and sell-side desks in the region.
The headline reads as preparation, not reaction.
Australian equities still concentrate on a single primary lit order book, with one competing lit venue and a small cluster of dark pools absorbing block flow.
Connectivity in that stack runs through the Sydney-based Australian Liquidity Centre (ALC) co-location facility.
A "more connected" framing, applied to that backdrop, points toward interoperability across the lit and dark venues and the adjacent derivatives clearing stack.
What does "more connected" mean at the trading layer?
A connected-market outlook typically addresses three layers. First, cross-venue order routing and SOR logic, where brokers rebalance between primary and secondary venues based on latency, fee schedule and displayed depth. Second, the FIX protocol and ITCH/OUCH feed formats that determine how fast a desk sees and acknowledges messages. Third, consolidated market data products sold by the primary exchange and by independent vendors.
Where does clearing sit in the picture?
Australian equities clearing runs through a single central counterparty. Derivatives clearing runs through a separate CCP. Any connectivity framing carries clearing implications because bilateral OTC and listed derivatives workflows increasingly converge on the same collateral and margin infrastructure. The eligible-collateral schedules and default-fund mechanics of those CCPs form the operational anchor that desks measure connectivity against.
What should a desk track in such an outlook?
A preparation-themed outlook typically catalogues vendor choices rather than mandate a single path. Desks segment the stack into four categories:
- OMS and EMS platforms from Bloomberg, Charles River, Eze Software and FlexTrade
- Connectivity providers including BT Radianz, IPC and direct ALC cross-connects
- Market data feeds from the primary exchange and from Refinitiv Elektron
- Post-trade reconciliation through the exchange reporting portal
A "preparing" framing suggests the piece inventories these options.
Buy-side desks preparing for the next connectivity wave typically budget for redundant ALC cross-connects, second-data-feed licensing, and a documented failover from a primary OMS to a broker-supplied EMS.
How does Australia differ from other markets?
Unlike the US, where the SIP consolidates tape data, Australia delivers the consolidated tape through a single primary exchange feed.
That structural choice concentrates market-data cost on one licence and one cross-connect, which simplifies procurement but removes the redundancy that US desks take for granted.
What the headline leaves open
The only material available to this column from the MarketScreener item is the headline and publication link. No executive quotation, no volume statistic, and no specific rule citation appear in the extract. The outlook therefore reads as a thematic survey rather than a regulatory update.
Whether the MarketScreener piece ties trading-technology connectivity to recent exchange data-fee reviews or to regulator market-integrity consultations will determine its value to a compliance officer. For an execution desk, the practical question is whether the new connectivity reduces realised spread, improves fill rates on routed orders, or simply adds another vendor invoice.
The next test of the "more connected" thesis arrives when the primary exchange publishes fresh latency benchmarks across its co-location gateways.
via Google News: Trading technology (Source)
More from Sophie Lindqvist
Show full bio
Senior reporter covering people, launches and day-to-day practice in market microstructure and institutional trading at Order Flow Brief.
61 articles
Blotter · related prints
Bloomberg Expands Electronic Trading for Australian Markets
300Bloomberg Expands Electronic Trading to Australian ETFs, Options and Futures
100CMCRC: SEC Rules 'Supporting' Dark Pools, Hedgeweek Reports
600Traders Magazine Frames Tokenisation as Market Structure Story
500HKEX Launches Order Routing Service for Fund Market
400